X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 08:41:11 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cygwin visual brand From: Alex Leigh To: cygwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Why not just use the "cyg-" prefix, like the cygstart and cygpath tools already do? Something like "cygsetup", "cygpackage", "cygpackman", etc. I think these both communicate clearly the purpose of the program and are short to type. Alex On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Klaus Grue wrote: > On Mon, 10 May 2010, Steven Collins wrote: >> >> ... I'm not a fan of "cpm.exe" for two reasons. 1) ... 2) ... > > Good points > >> "CygwinPackageManager.exe" communicates clearly what the >> program is without any further need of explanation. > > That is a good name. Simple is beautiful. > > Maybe one should also consider CygwinPM.exe. It is less informative but > there are still cases where short file names are nice to have. > > Klaus > > -- > Problem reports: =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: =A0 =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple