X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4BC5B95F.4030605@bopp.net> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:47:27 -0500 From: Jeremy Bopp User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Poderosa problem in 1.7 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com PJ Whitelock wrote: > Does anyone have a work around for Poderosa's incompatability with cygwin 1.7, ie looking for mount points in the registry when they're no longer there. Can you just create a fake registry entry with the same info as the fstab? As long as you don't have a legitimate Cygwin 1.5 installation laying around, there shouldn't be any reason that having those phony registry entries will hurt you. Whether or not that will be enough to trick Ponderosa is something you'll have to test. I'm also not sure if setup.exe will notice the entries and complain or delete them. Make sure to give that a try too just to be sure. -Jeremy -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple