X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: scp no longer reports incremental progress
References: <806a89db1003291509t34fb9e26y84a9c8a212f64a6d@mail.gmail.com>  <4BB125E5.2020203@cwilson.fastmail.fm>  <20100329221438.GA8111@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <20100331181715.GB20959@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <op.vahfgdd01e62zd@balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de>  <20100401144305.GA31187@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4BB4C735.4070802@gmx.de>  <20100401163707.GH18364@calimero.vinschen.de>  <op.vahuhzuy1e62zd@balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de>  <op.vahutn051e62zd@balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de>  <u2g2bf229d31004060455ice0daf35m2538a9dbc3dd2c73@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:57:24 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "Matthias Andree" <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <op.vaqudykm1e62zd@balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de>
In-Reply-To: <u2g2bf229d31004060455ice0daf35m2538a9dbc3dd2c73@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.51 (Win32)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Chris Sutcliffe wrote on 2010-04-06:

> On 2 April 2010 10:06, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> So let's get the network out of the picture. I also observe:
>>
>> 20100328, no processes running, ash -c "rebaseall -v" starts logging dll
>> names after < 1 s.
>>
>> 20100331, same situation, ash -c "rebaseall -v" shows no output. Note  
>> I'm
>> not waiting very long, if the system has become an order of magnitude  
>> slower
>> or goof up flushing console output that would also count as regression.
>>
>> I've run experiments in mintty as well as cmd.exe windows.
>
> Erm....  Not sure I follow here, was this supposed to be in response
> to the scp issue or a new topic?  Why would you rebase for the scp
> issue?

To scp.  scp forks ssh under the hood, and that might fail for obscure  
reasons, so this is just a safety measure not to report things that would  
get solved by "rebaseall".

-- 
Matthias Andree

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

