X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG,TW_YW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4BB405C4.2040500@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:32:36 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin qt port- do I have to apply patches or something? References: <4BB3F346.8030304@cygwin.com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 3/31/2010 9:54 PM, mike marchywka wrote: > On 3/31/10, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ . No reason to feed the spammers. Thanks. >> On 3/31/2010 7:48 PM, mike marchywka wrote: >>> I went ahead and applied the patches and configure at least >>> seems to run. I just assumed the patch files were for reference, >>> shouldn't the source be patched when downloaded or is there >>> a reason for this ( or do I have a larger fundamental problem and >>> applying these patches just lets configure run longer)? >> >> When patches are included you can assume: >> >> 1. The original pristine sources from upstream are included. >> >> 2. Any patches provided need to be applied to the pristine >> source to get things building for Cygwin. >> > ok that's fine it seems to be building but I ran into the function pointer > problem that I mentioned in other build and none of the patches > apparently fixed it so I just changed it. Of course, if there's a cygport script there, you shouldn't need to worry about any of this. Just run it. See: -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple