X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Oleksandr Gavenko Subject: Re: __STRICT_ANSI__ with -std=c99 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:35:46 +0200 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <4BA771E3.2080505@sbcglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 In-Reply-To: <4BA771E3.2080505@sbcglobal.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 2010.03.22 15:34, Greg Chicares wrote: > On 2010-03-22 13:03Z, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote: >> >> $ gcc -std=c99 -c -o grid.o grid.c > [...] >> grid.c:236: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strupr'. > > I'd expect that warning, because C99 defines no strupr() function. > Ok. But that the way to say to gcc use extended functions? By -std=gnu99? This function available only if exist corresponding prototype in header and libc contain func realization. As I know libc and system header is not always part of GCC. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple