X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4BA3C3C6.1050003@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:34:46 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7: Concurrency Issue with Shared State Initialization References: <20100319182756.GA22027@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4BA3C2C8.4060803@cygwin.com> <20100319183214.GB22027@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-reply-to: <20100319183214.GB22027@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 3/19/2010 2:32 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 02:30:32PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >> On 3/19/2010 2:27 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:59:40PM +0100, Schmidt, Oliver wrote: >>>> Thanks for your very active support in solving this issue with our far >>> >from mainstream scenario! >>> >>> You're welcome. It really was a pretty serious problem so I'm glad >>> that it surfaced and that we were theoretically able to fix it. >>> >>>> P.S.: I presume the fix will show up in the next Cygwin release. >>> >>> Nope. It's just for you. No one else is privileged enough to get the >>> fix. :-) >> >> I object! My mother always told me I was special. Doesn't that make me >> privileged too? > > Ok, ok. We'll make it available to you too. But that's it! Chris is nice. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple