X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:06:35 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7: Concurrency Issue with Shared State Initialization Message-ID: <20100316120635.GX6505@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Mar 16 10:53, Schmidt, Oliver wrote: > >No one is doubting that problems exist. That's why we're working > >on them. > > Sorry for again being unclear. The information above was soley meant to > complement the cygcheck output - which was produced on my XP-64 machine - > trying to say that the issue seems to be not tied to a certain OS variant. Would you mind to give the latest developer snapshot from http://www.cygwin.com/snapshots/ a try? It tries very carefully to eliminate concurrency problems in the initialization phase. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple