X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:17:48 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7: Concurrency Issue with Shared State Initialization Message-ID: <20100311091748.GE6505@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Mar 11 00:22, Schmidt, Oliver wrote: > Hi, > > >>> I'll test the snapshot asap! > > >>The final patch is from cgf. It's probably more performant since it > >>drops the requirement for an additional spinlock. > > >The snapshot contains try #3 on getting the locking right. > > Thank you both for clarifying. I was already aware of that by browsing > through the CVS commits but my statement above was far from clear on > that :-( No worries. Does the patch help? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple