X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:47:29 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cron & Windows 7
Message-ID: <20100212184729.GC5683@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <01a301caab2a$1c496a70$7b00a8c0@wirelessworld.airvananet.com>  <20100211151748.GN28659@calimero.vinschen.de>  <01ef01caab42$ed7a31c0$7b00a8c0@wirelessworld.airvananet.com>  <20100211185214.GS28659@calimero.vinschen.de>  <027b01caab6e$2dc88a30$7b00a8c0@wirelessworld.airvananet.com>  <20100212100958.GU28659@calimero.vinschen.de>  <02f901caabf6$b4497d20$7b00a8c0@wirelessworld.airvananet.com>  <20100212173937.GX28659@calimero.vinschen.de>  <20100212174357.GY28659@calimero.vinschen.de>  <037001caac11$e02c46a0$7b00a8c0@wirelessworld.airvananet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <037001caac11$e02c46a0$7b00a8c0@wirelessworld.airvananet.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Feb 12 13:33, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> From: "Corinna Vinschen" 
> | On Feb 12 18:39, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> | > Cool!  Look at the date!  So I did it again wrong after you already
> | > fixed it in 2002.  Oh well.  Btw, I tested this today and it seems the
> | > patch is working.  I'll just change it to use a well_known_builtin_sid
> | > rather than creating the SID on the fly.
> | 
> | Nevertheless, would you mind to test it as well?  Easy chance that I
> | missed something.
> 
> Matthias just tested what I did last night, which was based on what
> you had sent, but also defining well_known_users_sid in security.h etc.. 

Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean.  well_known_users_sid
*is* already defined in security.h since my patch from 2010-01-08.
 
> Now cron works on his system. Looks like we are duplicating efforts!
> 
> I just refreshed cvs and get_token_group_sidlist still has:
>       grp_list *= well_known_users_sid;

Yes, sure.  What's the problem?  You wrote in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-02/msg00291.html that always adding
well_known_users_sid is a good idea from your POV.  I currently don't
understand what you're trying to say.

> I was also looking at the lsaauth code and noticed you exclude all
> well-known groups.
> Does lsa put them in the token anyway? Otherwise how does 
> USERS get in there?

Yes.

> I have many other observations but that will be for later.

Ok.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

