X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <815356.61157.qm@web35908.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:07:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Javier <gweobia@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: select() does not modify timeout (arg 5) on return
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <20100211030624.GB2654@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

> I believe actually made a conscious decision not to alter
> the arguments when
> I first wrote select().=9A However, times have changed
> so it probably makes
> sense to alter it to be more linux-like now.
>=20
> I'll look into doing that.

Can we expect it to be patched in next version? Any plans to release next v=
ersion soon?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple