X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:21:54 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: dlclose not calling destructors of static variables. Message-ID: <20100202162154.GA8953@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20100201162603.GB25374@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4B6710CE.40300@gmail.com> <20100201174611.GA26080@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20100201175123.GB26080@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4B672B74.4090808@gmail.com> <4B673D5F.4050104@gmail.com> <4B6746A5.3090203@gmail.com> <4B67F236.6020307@gmail.com> <20100202151612.GA8308@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4B684502.4070702@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B684502.4070702@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:30:10PM +0000, Andrew West wrote: >On 02/02/2010 15:16, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0000, Andrew West wrote: >> >>> O.k. I've changed remove_dll_atexit to; >>> >>> remove_dll_atexit (const dll *d) >>> { >>> >>> unsigned char *dll_beg = (unsigned char *) d->handle + 0x1000; >>> unsigned char *dll_end = (unsigned char *) d->p.data_start; >>> >> According to gdb, setting dll_end to this is functionally equivalent to >> using AllocationBase + RegionSize. I thought you tried that already. >> >> But, anyway... > >I think Dave Korn mentioned that it's possible for the .text to be >broken into multiple regions, so perhaps RegionSize >only shows the size of one of those multiple regions. There's another >message on the list with more detail, either way >for me AllocationBase + RegionSize didn't match p.data_start for me. Sorry. Even after carefully checking my work I got it wrong. I meant BaseAddress + RegionSize. It is barely possible that the data segment is getting relocated but I don't see how the text segment could be broken up. If the data segment is getting put elsewhere then it isn't a reliable indicator of the end of the text segment. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple