X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:26:56 +0100 From: Gary To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cppunit: rebuild for gcc4 Message-ID: <20100202152656.GA3024@mimosa.garydjones.name> References: <4B4C3811.3010403@users.sourceforge.net> <4B6798F5.2030205@users.sourceforge.net> <20100202102342.GA3804@mimosa.garydjones.name> <20100202152236.GB8308@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100202152236.GB8308@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:22:36AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:23:42AM +0100, Gary wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:16:05PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > >>On 12/01/2010 02:51, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > >>>Could you please build the lateset cppunit with gcc4? The last release > >>>was built with gcc3 and does not work with a gcc4-compiled package. > > > >>Ping? > > > >Is something stopping you building cppunit yourself? I know it is nice > >to have the packages up to date, and I'm sure the maintainer will get > >around to it when he can, but can't you use a locally built copy in the > >meantime? Who knows, maybe Ross would appreciate some help doing it > >:-) > > Yaakov, please stop being so selfish and ITA every single package in the > distribution. I wasn't suggesting that at all, as you well know. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple