X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4B67F236.6020307@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:36:54 +0000
From: Andrew West <andrewwest@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: dlclose not calling destructors of static variables.
References: <4B61732F.4030804@gmail.com>  <4B62DDE6.5070106@gmail.com>  <4B62F118.8010305@gmail.com>  <20100129184514.GA9550@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <4B66BF2F.4060802@gmail.com>  <20100201162603.GB25374@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <4B6710CE.40300@gmail.com>  <20100201174611.GA26080@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20100201175123.GB26080@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4B672B74.4090808@gmail.com> <4B673D5F.4050104@gmail.com> <4B6746A5.3090203@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B6746A5.3090203@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 01/02/2010 21:24, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 01/02/2010 20:45, Andrew wrote:
>
>    
>> I'm not looking to submit a patch to fix this, I'll leave that up to the
>> professionals who have a better idea about the whole picture. It's just
>> I've hit a brick wall with my code with this bug so I'm looking for some
>> work arounds for myself.
>>      
>    No, really, you've been a ton of help, thanks a million.  Try the patch I
> just posted to the cygwin-patches list, on top of current CVS:
>
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2010-q1/msg00051.html
>
>    That should get you going with your current DLLs.
>
>    Next step is to add the cxx abi functions.  I found an old patch lying
> around, seems I started looking at this back in August and then lost track of
> it somehow (probably in the rush approaching the end of gcc stage 1, I guess),
> so I owe you apologies for the inconvenience.
>
>      cheers,
>        DaveK
>
>    

O.k. I've changed remove_dll_atexit to;

remove_dll_atexit (const dll *d)
  {

    unsigned char *dll_beg = (unsigned char *) d->handle + 0x1000;
    unsigned char *dll_end = (unsigned char *) d->p.data_start;

That should cover the entire .text section for the dll. Offset the handle by 0x1000
to skip the file header and section alignment, and data_start to get the end of the
.text section. I noticed in patch you linked that you also tested against bss_end.
Doesn't bss_end always come after data_end so if the first if statement matches the
second will as well? And is it possible to have atexit functions within the data
( non executable code ) section?

I tested my changes against my simple test case and against my full program and they
both seems to work fine.

Andy



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

