X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_40,BOTNET
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-id: <4B662A9F.9060907@cygwin.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:13:03 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320  Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Windows 7
References: <001901ca9fe3$168b7030$43a25090$@net> <4B61CE12.1030403@gmail.com>  <18d205ed1001280950x4d93473ev3f9e9137e97551d8@mail.gmail.com>  <20100130013832.M15665@ds.net>
In-reply-to: <20100130013832.M15665@ds.net>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 01/29/2010 08:45 PM, Brian Wilson wrote:
> I had a similar problem upgrading on XP.  I think my issue was related to a
> heap space allocation issue which prevents the shell from running during the
> installation.  I found that failed installations left shell processes running,
> but not doing anything useful.
>
> Check the documentation as I believe there is a fix for the heap space issue.
> In my case, I killed these useless shells and that allowed the Cygwin bash
> shell to start up with out heap space errors.  I cleaned out the
> /etc/postinstall directory by removing any shell scripts (rm *.sh) and
> rerunning the setup.  Cygwin installed okay for me after that.

There's no reason to remove postinstall scripts and, in fact, very good reason
to not do so - your installation could be incomplete.  If things are working for
you and you have no complaints, there's no reason to revisit this issue but in
case others reading this thread thought this would be a good thing to try, I
wanted something on record that would recommend against it.

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

