X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:16:20 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: FW: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance] Message-ID: <20100126161620.GA5905@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A208B26371A8@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> <20100126152443.GA5307@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A208B26371CD@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A208B26371CD@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:01:30AM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: >I know better than to argue with you in general and on this subject in >particular. (For those who don't know, Chris used to work for Cygnus >Solutions.) I just thought that it might be useful to point those who >are interested to the official historical documentation. If there is >something wrong in that documentation, I suggest that you take it up with >the web master, not me. :-) I was clarifying what was on the page someone wanted to use the words there to "prove" that the project's goals were always to provide "native" windows binaries. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple