X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4B503264.6050700@towo.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:16:20 +0100
From: Thomas Wolff <towo@towo.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: gcc4: FHS nit
References: <4B4F8369.7050508@users.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B4F8369.7050508@users.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> I just came across this in FHS[1]:
> > If a C preprocessor is installed, /lib/cpp must be a reference to it,
> > for historical reasons.
> Yes, it's nitpicking, and I personally don't really care, but adding a 
> /lib/cpp -> /usr/bin/cpp-4.exe to the gcc4-core alternatives would 
> make this compliant.
Shouldn't it be /lib/cpp -> /etc/alternatives/cpp then?
------
Thomas

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

