X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:14:46 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygport: latest diffutils issues warning Message-ID: <20091231071446.GA4584@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4B3C06C1.9080007@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <4B3C1C77.9060700@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B3C1C77.9060700@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 09:37:27PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >On 30/12/2009 20:04, Charles Wilson wrote: >> The -u0 syntax has been deprecated, and now causes this message: >> >>>>> Checking packages for missing or duplicate files >> diff: `-0' option is obsolete; use `-U 0' >> diff: Try `diff --help' for more information. >> diff: `-0' option is obsolete; use `-U 0' >> diff: Try `diff --help' for more information. > >Strange, cgf wrote in the announcement: > >> This is just a refresh of the diffutils package using more >> modern versions of cygwin, gcc, and dependent libraries. There is no new >> functionality. > >Apparently it's not quite so simple. It really is. I just recompiled the same directory that I used last time. I can't explain the discrepancy. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple