X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:06:08 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7.1-1 - problem with non-blocking socket IO Message-ID: <20091229220608.GA28728@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20091228172405.GB15530@calimero.vinschen.de> <4B399DA6.2070605@cygwin.com> <20091229083052.GF15530@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091229083052.GF15530@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Dec 29 09:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 29 01:11, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > > On 12/29/2009 01:07 AM, Uri Simchoni wrote: > > >Thanks for the quick response. Could you post the patch? > > > > See the cygwin-cvs mailing list for applied patches to Cygwin. In this case: > > > > Tonight (yes, unfortunately) it occured to me that the patch isn't quite > correct, yet. I haven't much time, what with vacation and all that, but > I know what has to be changed. I'll come up with a better solution in > the next couple of days. False alarm. The code is already doing the right thing, AFAICS. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple