X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4B383735.9010106@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:42:29 +0000
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: My"C" Compiled can't compile "{}"
References: <4B381883.7030002@columbus.rr.com> <4B382F92.4000806@gmail.com> <4B382F54.9020202@columbus.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B382F54.9020202@columbus.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Paul McFerrin wrote:

> From my years of experiences, "{}" is the simplest version of a
> to-be-compiled C program.  

  No it isn't.

> It is syntaxily correct.  

  No it isn't.

> in any case, the above DID work in 1.7-68.

  No it didn't.  Your code is gibberish and has never worked on anything anywhere.


  You're probably having a terrible mis-remembering accident based on having
once seen something like "main(){}" somewhere.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple