X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4B27E1AA.9050901@cs.umass.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:21:14 -0500
From: Eliot Moss <moss@cs.umass.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Suggested patch for cygwin perl 5.10
References: <4B27B922.6070107@cs.umass.edu> <4B27DE97.8000101@x-ray.at>
In-Reply-To: <4B27DE97.8000101@x-ray.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Sorry I got it backwards; thanks for the tip, and for
looking into it. Yes, I am sure Cwd is tricky to get right!
The first change is cygwin-specific, so might be less
controversial. Not so certain about the other one --
might need to be conditioned on cygwin. I don't know
much about perl, really, and the Cwd change is something
I seem to recall I picked up from an email in an archive
on svk ...

Regards -- Eliot

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple