Message-ID: <26779905.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:22:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Marc Girod <marc.girod@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Merits of ClearCase
In-Reply-To: <4B2649D0.7010705@byu.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <26769438.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B2557EC.5070506@gmail.com> <26770209.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B257717.4070503@gmail.com> <hg45o8$rvf$1@ger.gmane.org> <4B2638FD.3040200@byu.net> <26778349.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B2649D0.7010705@byu.net>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com


Eric Blake wrote:
> 
> That's a workaround, not a solution.  Any VCS that requires an O(n) (n as
> the number of files being labeled) labeling post-processing pass in order
> to create enough records in the database to track commits atomically, when
> there are O(1) solutions like git where commits are atomic _without any
> additional effort), is just too slow to be worth anything in my opinion.
> 
Renaming a label type is an O(0) operation.
It doesn't depend on the number of labels of that type applied.

Eric Blake wrote:
> 
> Besides, git is open source, clearcase is not. 
> 
That's a different issue.
I very much agree on the advantages of free software.

But you are still comparing a free horse to a commercial plane.
And, there is some freedom bound to the fact the latter flies.

Marc
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Looking-for-the-%27stdout%27-of-a-Windows-application-tp26769438p26779905.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple