X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4B1E66C3.1050607@etr-usa.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:46:27 -0700
From: Warren Young <warren@etr-usa.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: General questions about upgrading to 1.7
References: <20091208124500.GB10816@ghost> <20091208121908.GD8059@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20091208121908.GD8059@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec  8 13:45, d.sastre.medina@gmail.com wrote:
>> I'm plannig to migrate my production env (i.e. my XPSP3 box at work
>> 8-D), from 1.5.25 to 1.7 as soon as there is an official release,
> 
> There's no reason not to use the current beta.

True.  Many of us have been using it for serious work for months now.  I 
migrated in February or so, and every problem I've had is now months in 
the past.

> If you want to be on the safe side, install Cygwin 1.7 into another
> directory, for instance C:\cygwin-1.7.

...and be sure to tell it the new directory name on the *first* run of 
setup-1.7.exe, yea even on the first visit to that screen.  There's a 
point beyond that screen and before you exit setup.exe where you all but 
irrevocably convert an existing 1.5 install to a 1.7 one.  You don't 
even have to actually start the install process; just going deep enough 
into the wizard with it believing you want to upgrade in place is enough.

Personally, I'd just back that directory *and* all the Cygwin registry 
sub-trees up and go ahead with the upgrade-in-place.  Parallel Cygwin 
installs work, but there are annoyances.

Given your evident conservatism (XP SP3), I hope you have a concrete 
reason for upgrading Cygwin.  If not, there's apparently a philosophical 
mismatch somewhere.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

