X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:20:25 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools Message-ID: <20091202002025.GA29446@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4B158A2C.20101@cryptelium.net> <4B1593C7.70301@cygwin.com> <4B15995F.4020602@cryptelium.net> <4B15A6AF.4010108@cygwin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B15A6AF.4010108@cygwin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 06:28:47PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >On 12/01/2009 05:31 PM, kiorky wrote: >> Larry Hall (Cygwin) a ??crit : >> >>> Can we see *attached* cygcheck output for your 1.7 and 1.5 installs, as >> 1.out -> cygwin >> 2.out -> cygwin2 > >Thanks. Since cygcheck for 1.5 doesn't find gcc and you have tools from >other sources installed, I have to ask, are you comparing Cygwin's 1.5 build >tools with Cygwin's 1.7 build tools? And, follow on observation: The OP really should clean up his path to remove duplicates. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple