X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <26370924.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:19:42 -0800 (PST)
From: aputerguy <nabble@kosowsky.org>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Seems like treatment of NTFS ADS (foo:bar) changed between 1.5     	and 1.7 but not mentioned in What's Changed
In-Reply-To: <20091116120650.GH29173@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <26363833.post@talk.nabble.com> <416096c60911151427g12cc5582t6d9bbdc063c5b14a@mail.gmail.com> <4B013E09.1010209@towo.net> <20091116120650.GH29173@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com


I think it should still at least be documented as a change especially since a
deliberate change.
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Seems-like-treatment-of-NTFS-ADS-%28foo%3Abar%29-changed-between-1.5-and-1.7-but-not-mentioned-in-What%27s-Changed-tp26363833p26370924.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple