X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:51:20 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: subinacl not consistent with getfacl under ssh login (USERNAME=SYSTEM) Message-ID: <20091116085120.GD3503@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <26355883.post@talk.nabble.com> <26366622.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B0114D6.4030703@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B0114D6.4030703@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Nov 16 09:01, Dave Korn wrote: > aputerguy wrote: > > > So is 'subinacl' just another example of these badly behaved non-Cygwin > > applications? > > Looks like it. > > > If so, is there anything one can do other than to use one of the other > > methods to get a properly authenticated ssh login? > > You mean, apart from the other methods to get a properly authenticated ssh > login, is there a method to get a properly authenticated ssh login? No, there > is no method to get a properly authenticated ssh login, apart from the methods > to get a properly authenticated ssh login. If you want a method to get a > properly authenticated ssh login, I'm afraid you're completely stuck; you'll > just have to use one of the methods to get an authenticated ssh login. Sounds tricky... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple