X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:04:59 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: find Performance extremly slow Message-ID: <20091110150459.GE4616@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:22:27AM +0100, Grundmann, Christian wrote: >Hi, > >the Performance of the find.exe is very very slow in comparison to other Tools like cygwin > >If i use MKS Toolkit the Search "find WINDOWS -name *.dll" >Finished in 3,5 seconds > >If I use Cygwin the Search >Finished in 7,8 seconds > >In even bigger Trees the Performance goes to 3 Times slower > >Thx for the help I knew we shouldn't have put all of those "sleep(5)"s in find.exe... cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple