X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <26226433.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:38:15 -0800 (PST)
From: aputerguy <nabble@kosowsky.org>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Is there a fast way to get acl's for the whole filesystem (or  chunk  thereof)
In-Reply-To: <6fv6f5dgkrgi6baa9ghfjaqp7h9a3eq9pj@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <26222793.post@talk.nabble.com> <6fv6f5dgkrgi6baa9ghfjaqp7h9a3eq9pj@4ax.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com



Andrew Schulman-3 wrote:
> getfacl -R?

Unfortunately, no '-R' at least on my updated version.

The "-exec ... \+" and the "-print0 | xargs -0" tricks both worked!!!
Thanks.

Timing and comparing the two approaches, it seems like they both use the
same 'user' time but the xargs approach uses only about half the 'system'
time.
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Is-there-a-fast-way-to-get-acl%27s-for-the-whole-filesystem-%28or-chunk-thereof%29-tp26222793p26226433.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple