X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:39:50 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: latest libstdc++ causing ffmpeg & mplayer to segfault
Message-ID: <20091002053950.GC23109@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <a07c15f00909300907v3b550276o7511fea29255832d@mail.gmail.com>  <4AC39420.20702@gmail.com>  <a07c15f00910010713n24c387efm1d192e26d064e455@mail.gmail.com>  <4AC527D3.6050106@gmail.com>  <4AC52F4B.6090701@users.sourceforge.net>  <4AC5350F.8050105@gmail.com>  <4AC54EB5.1000103@gmail.com>  <4AC57AFF.3090004@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AC57AFF.3090004@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 11:01:03PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>On 01/10/2009 19:52, Dave Korn wrote:
>>    Correction: the fixes in the snapshot are sufficient for now, and will allow
>> mplayer to work.  (There appears to be something else buggy on head that was
>> confounding my efforts to test a fix.)
>>
>>    There is still I think a potential loophole that we just haven't done
>> anything complex to run up enough against yet, but it's not going to cause
>> trouble this week, I think.
>
>Am I correct that the real fix for this is simply rebuilding with a new 
>enough libcygwin.a?  And exactly which versions were faulty?

Yes, you're correct.

I posted the faulty versions a while ago:

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:48:27AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I can say that any DLL built with cygwin-1.7.0-51 - cygwin-1.7.0-56
>is probably suspect.  That's 2009-07-13 - 2009-08-13 .

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

