X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4AB4564F.2060006@tlinx.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:55:59 -0700
From: Linda Walsh <cygwin@tlinx.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 ThunderBrowse/3.2.6.4 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cygdrive prefix
References: <ee47a1dc39b42cb6fdd0c2dff9ff3053@mail.smartmobili.com> 	<h8r26b$peb$1@ger.gmane.org> 	<182640b4a6730dafadd266e0cfc9d9bf@mail.smartmobili.com> 	<h8ripc$itl$1@ger.gmane.org> 	<416096c60909161406tbfd73ey7a5b9510e7f97762@mail.gmail.com> 	<4AB15B51.1020006@gmail.com> 	<416096c60909162218j2890ea1flec06819fbbc8f282@mail.gmail.com> 	<20090917052007.GA12511@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> 	<416096c60909162236g528635a5s72a6788187ad61d2@mail.gmail.com> 	<4AB1DBBC.6080808@tlinx.org> <r6ciqfiroh6.fsf@mch8395n.mch.fsc.net>
In-Reply-To: <r6ciqfiroh6.fsf@mch8395n.mch.fsc.net>
X-Stationery: 0.4.10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Harald Joerg wrote:
> Linda Walsh writes:
> 
>> [...] OTOH, at least the defaults are pretty sensible ...
> 
> Pretty sensible, indeed.  I love /cygdrive as just another example of a
> pretty sensible default.
---
	Well, MS, put their unix in /unix.  Wouldn't it make sense to put
a cygwin subsystem in /cygwin?  

	It's not like it's really "a program" (belonging in "/prog"...).

> 
>> ... (I can just hit ENTER), through the setup ...
> 
> ...and the default buttons in the GUI are always in the same place on
> the screen, so if I happen to use a mouse I can just click through, no
> need to move the mouse.  Not a big deal, maybe, but if so, why are so
> many other installers missing it?
----
	I *used* to "not get it" viz-a-vie the GUI, too.  You just have to
place your mouse over the cygwin window, then hit the enter key a bunch
of times till you get to the program selection window.  There, I admit,
it is sized awfully small to see anything -- so I usually have to resize
if I want anything other than the default selection...

> 
>> ... -- EXCEPT...at the end -- how many times do I have to tell setup
>> that I *STILL* don't want the icon on my desktop??!
> 
> I eventually got around that one.
> 
> I found that I do not want *any* icons on my desktop and switched them
> off completely.  There is an option in the "Sort symbols" function of
> the desktop.
---
	Well...there are times when I grab all of the icons on my desktop
in some frustrated moment, and drop them in a permanent link-to-folder,
'desktop-archive'...  so if I ever want to see what I tossed off the DT...

	But I put icons on the desktop for items I currently want to work
with -- sometimes it nice to have the ready access...

-l

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

