Message-ID: <421404.53076.qm@web25504.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:58:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri@yahoo.it>
Subject: Re: std::arg() bug : not repetitive ?
To: cygwin@cygwin.com, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A9DC24F.4070309@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

--- Mer 2/9/09, Dave Korn  ha scritto:
=20
> =A0 Bah.=A0 Still, at least the -ffloat-store
> workaround still helps, for this
> case at any rate..=A0 Also, if you get GCC to use SSE
> instructions, there's no
> issue with excess precision:
>=20
> > $ g++-4 comp_2.cc -o0 -o comp_2 -I
> /usr/include/octave-3.2.0/octave -march=3Dpent
> > ium4 -msse -mfpmath=3Dsse
> >=20
> > $ ./comp_2.exe
> > 0.785398
> > 0.785398
> > 0
> > 0
> >=20
> > $

Are this setting acceptable for a cygwin package ?

-march=3Dpentium4 -msse -mfpmath=3Dsse


>=20
> =A0 However it does look like it's not going to get
> fully fixed for C++ until
> someone with some serious language-lawyering skills can
> spend some time
> defining the exact semantics.

Not me. ;-(

>=20
> =A0 =A0 cheers,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 DaveK
>=20


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple