X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A9CF7A1.8060704@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:29:53 +0100 From: Dave Korn Reply-To: cant.you.tell@i.dont.want.replies.invalid User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: GNU screen hangs References: <4A9C14BA.8000905@cornell.edu> <4A9C394D.8010201@cornell.edu> <20090831213625.GB14033@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090831222750.GC14033@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com TV wrote: > On 2009-08-31, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Apparently you don't know who I am. > > An even bigger pile of Don't kid yourself: it's you that's at fault, not the whole rest of the world. You've been rude and arrogant from your first post. It's certainly not just him who thinks so, I was going to reply about three separate times until I saw what you were doing. Posting people's email addresses gets them spammed. It's not just a petty rule, it's a verified fact proven by scientific experimentation and measurement. Here's proof: http://www.cdt.org/speech/spam/030319spamreport.shtml Deliberately violating list netiquette and morphing your From: line to evade a ban is regarded as network abuse pretty much everywhere. It's certainly anti-social. DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple