From: Andrew Schulman <schulman.andrew@epamail.epa.gov>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Installing lftp[1.7]
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:16:32 -0400
Message-ID: <k3su85pktar4tsrpntpraqfj4otmb5hli3@4ax.com>
References: <4A8C8739.9060009@alice.it> <6hps85hin1v53f59us8kv9kjjamgho9oq4@4ax.com> <20090821095523.GH32408@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090821095523.GH32408@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

> > > The installation of lftp in 1.7 produces
> > >=20
> > > /usr/share/lftp
> > > /usr/share/doc/lftp
> > >=20
> > > with permissions:
> > >=20
> > > drwxr-x---
> > >=20
> > > Running 'cygcheck -cv > out' in a non-administrator account flags 'lf=
tp'=20
> > > as 'Incomplete'. Instead it is complete, as showed by the same comman=
d=20
> > > from root account. Adjusting to drwxr-xr-x fixes the cygcheck also fo=
r=20
> > > non-admin.
> >=20
> > Hm.  It's true that when I look in the binary package file, the directo=
ries have
> > the permissions you state above.  I've always ignored permissions in my
> > packages, because I understood that setup.exe would adjust them on inst=
allation.
> > Is that not true?
>=20
> No.  Setup-1.7 uses the POSIX permissions as stored in the tar archive
> for quite some time now.

OK, well that explains it then.  I think I'll have to go back and have anot=
her
look at all of my packages now.

Angelo, thanks for the report.  I'm away from my Cygwin installation this w=
eek,
but I'll have a look at this early next week and will release a new lftp pa=
ckage
for Cygwin 1.7.

Andrew.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple