X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:26:23 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: run-1.1.11-1
Message-ID: <20090817182623.GA32734@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <200908161558.n7GFwZ16011900@StraightRunning.com>  <4A883A1D.10109@cwilson.fastmail.fm>  <20090817084750.GP32408@calimero.vinschen.de>  <4A894A82.2010109@cornell.edu>  <20090817135758.GZ32408@calimero.vinschen.de>  <4385EB0C1AF79960A02CC313@qjunbur.quns.cam.ac.uk>  <450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D54669D@DF-M14-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>  <B90CE21C4DCDA1A0319E75BF@qjunbur.quns.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B90CE21C4DCDA1A0319E75BF@qjunbur.quns.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 07:16:17PM +0100, Robin Walker wrote:
>--On 17 August 2009 17:52 +0000 Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
>> Robin Walker wrote:
>> " On any NT-class Windows, calling a *.bat file causes a 16-bit
>> sub-system to  " be spawned, and the .bat file is interpreted within the
>> 16-bit command  " interpreter.
>> "
>> " Given that Cygwin 1.7 no longer supports Windows 9x systems, it would
>> " probably make sense to convert as many .bat files as possible to .cmd
>> " files, so that they run within the normal 32-bit command interpreter.
>> "
>> " Does the startxwin.bat script work when it is renamed startxwin.cmd ?
>>
>> This is certainly an interesting question, but I'm not sure I believe the
>> preceding claim.
>
>OK, I stand corrected.  It looks as if something that bit me more years ago 
>than I can remember is not in fact the problem that I mis-remembered it to 
>be.
>
>Sorry for wasting your time!

Too bad.  It was an interesting supposition, at least.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

