X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_93
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:16:17 +0100
From: Robin Walker <rdhw@cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: Robin Walker <rdhw@cam.ac.uk>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: run-1.1.11-1
Message-ID: <B90CE21C4DCDA1A0319E75BF@qjunbur.quns.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D54669D@DF-M14-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <200908161558.n7GFwZ16011900@StraightRunning.com>    <4A883A1D.10109@cwilson.fastmail.fm>    <20090817084750.GP32408@calimero.vinschen.de>   <4A894A82.2010109@cornell.edu>    <20090817135758.GZ32408@calimero.vinschen.de>   <4385EB0C1AF79960A02CC313@qjunbur.quns.cam.ac.uk>  <450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D54669D@DF-M14-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

--On 17 August 2009 17:52 +0000 Stephan Mueller wrote:

> Robin Walker wrote:
> " On any NT-class Windows, calling a *.bat file causes a 16-bit
> sub-system to  " be spawned, and the .bat file is interpreted within the
> 16-bit command  " interpreter.
> "
> " Given that Cygwin 1.7 no longer supports Windows 9x systems, it would
> " probably make sense to convert as many .bat files as possible to .cmd
> " files, so that they run within the normal 32-bit command interpreter.
> "
> " Does the startxwin.bat script work when it is renamed startxwin.cmd ?
>
> This is certainly an interesting question, but I'm not sure I believe the
> preceding claim.

OK, I stand corrected.  It looks as if something that bit me more years ago 
than I can remember is not in fact the problem that I mis-remembered it to 
be.

Sorry for wasting your time!

-- 
Robin Walker

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

