X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:40:39 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [1.7] Updated: libsigsegv-2.6-1
Message-ID: <20090723144038.GA11519@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <4A678AC7.7090303@x-ray.at>  <4A6854F8.4060204@byu.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A6854F8.4060204@byu.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 06:18:00AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>According to Reini Urban on 7/22/2009 3:55 PM:
>>I've updated libsigsegv to 2.6-1 and added a shared library in
>>libsigsegv0-2.6-1 I hope this solves the SEH corruption issue a little
>>bit, as discussed at http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-07/msg00639.html
>
>Nope, 2.6 still has the SEH misuse bug.  But if you want to rebuild
>from a git repository, my patches are now available to fix the SEH
>handling (although I recommend building against cygwin snapshot
>20090722 or newer; building against cygwin 1.7.0-51 will detect that
>si_addr is still broken, and pick up baggage related to cygwin 1.5 but
>not necessary for the latest cygwin1.dll).  I only lightly tested a
>shared library with my patches.  Although the testsuite passed while
>using the shared library, I am still wondering if there could be a
>problem at program shutdown if the shared library is removed from
>memory without modifying its SEH handler back to cygwin's handler, but
>I don't have any test case that provoked that scenario.
>
>$ git pull git://repo.or.cz/libsigsegv/ericb.git master

I'm still mystified as to how a package which uses automatic variables
to deal with a stack overflow situation could claim to be handling stack
overflow.

I really don't like the games this package plays.  I'm halfway tempted
to just make it nonfunctional in Cygwin.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

