X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_73,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4A5FB423.90609@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:13:39 +0100
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Trouble creating crontab
References: <87skgwy4rb.fsf@gmail.com> <4A5F5A73.1070708@cygwin.com> <87ocrky34v.fsf@gmail.com> <4A5F5EDD.4080001@cygwin.com> <87k528y1nb.fsf@gmail.com> <slrnh5v7vl.1bph.oudeis@isis.thalatta.eme> <20090716215248.GA28657@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <slrnh5v9g9.1bph.oudeis@isis.thalatta.eme> <4A5FAAA7.1060600@bmts.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A5FAAA7.1060600@bmts.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Ralph Hempel wrote:
> Will Parsons wrote:
> 
>>>>> Is there no way of just creating the file without using crontab -e?
>>>> Sure.  I've been editing crontabs for years and have never once used
>>>> crontab -e.  What I do:
>>>>
>>>> crontab -l > crontab.lst edit crontab.lst crontab crontab.lst
>>> I always just use the toggle switches on the front panel of my computer.
>>>
>>> Much easier.
>>
>> Was that really necessary?  The procedure I use may very well be easier
>> than figuring out the right thing to do to invoke one's editor of choice
>> with the -e option.  In my case, I prefer to explicitly to export the
>> crontab table into a file so that I can put it into revision control.  At
>> any rate, answering an explicit question from the OP hardly deserves a
>> display of sarcasm.
> 
> Honestly, can we please not have every "sarcastic" answer interpreted
> as a personal slight?

  Hear hear!  It's a bog-standard rhetorical writing technique, not a personal
attack, and anyone who takes it as such is guilty of
thinking-it's-always-about-them.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

