X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-498953.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-MDAV-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:14:28 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:14:28 +0100 	(not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source)
X-MDRemoteIP: 188.220.16.97
X-Return-Path: prvs=144737c3d0=killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <A8982D2A3925429B83BAC5831D83CEF7@multiplay.co.uk>
From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <F24D5DF71BEC447DB0E080A0D6451ABB@multiplay.co.uk>  <20090714205617.GA12534@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <8541BCA91FF64580AA7A8065FBF9C938@multiplay.co.uk>  <39B3B148DA514671BB2E1AE46946169C@multiplay.co.uk>  <20090715000331.GA5635@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <6D01817BC10A4430AFE7A590CC935C09@multiplay.co.uk>  <20090715152139.GA694@calimero.vinschen.de>  <4A5DFDDF.2000904@gmail.com>  <20090715162243.GL14502@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <4A5E0AB1.9020201@gmail.com> <20090715185636.GA16211@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Subject: Re: perl threads on 2008 R2 64bit = crash ( was: perl 5.10 threads  on 1.5.25 = instant crash )
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:14:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	format=flowed; 	charset="iso-8859-1"; 	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Faylor"
> The point is that this is generating the equivalent of a SEGV without
> ever hitting Cygwin's "SEH" code.  Setting a breakpoint on the line
> would likely just show you the call stack but would not provide any
> insight into why the myfault was not invoked.

Of note when running 1.5.25 I did get the windows application error
dialog, but with 1.7 and the latest snapshot it doesn't, so maybe using
1.5.25 might help?

    Regards
    Steve


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

