X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4A574020.1040603@sidefx.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:20:32 -0400
From: Edward Lam <edward@sidefx.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: dash vs. ash?
References: <9e3fd2c80907100137s1c478e23s3ede80d7f8484355@mail.gmail.com> <20090710084147.GA12569@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090710084147.GA12569@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I think dash is preferred in future.  In theory we should dash hardlink
> to ash and deprecate the ash package entirely.  It's about time.  Eric?

Is dash as fast as ash?

-Edward

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple