Message-ID: <4A572880.5030604@byu.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:39:44 -0600
From: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: dash vs. ash?
References: <9e3fd2c80907100137s1c478e23s3ede80d7f8484355@mail.gmail.com> <20090710084147.GA12569@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090710084147.GA12569@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Corinna Vinschen on 7/10/2009 2:41 AM:
> I think dash is preferred in future.  In theory we should dash hardlink
> to ash and deprecate the ash package entirely.  It's about time.  Eric?

It would work for me.  I can whip out dash-0.5.5.1-2 to provide the ash
hardlink; do you want me to also do the work of providing the empty ash
package in the _obsolete category, or do you still want to do that as ash
maintainer (along with coordinating the two uploads)?

Also, I found a patch online that purports to add LINENO support to dash,
and I am currently playing with it to see how well it behaves.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9@byu.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpXKIAACgkQ84KuGfSFAYA/cACgmg7Sk/ZT6J6Ulr/fxpJu/Klo
IYsAn1eN2l2MHmckQVk6lBIUcRqoKVcc
=BsgA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple