X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:31:03 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Call for TESTING (was Re: [1.7.0-50] scp progress counter flies through first 175 MB or so) Message-ID: <20090701153103.GA5802@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20090629092857.GZ30864@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090629095322.GD30864@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090629142348.GB19123@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090629144030.GC19123@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4A490F0E.6040806@etr-usa.com> <20090630112617.GS30864@calimero.vinschen.de> <4A4A3B64.4030004@etr-usa.com> <20090701092617.GU30864@calimero.vinschen.de> <2bf229d30907010723r3d1e38caxbb8cc70d998b4ac7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2bf229d30907010723r3d1e38caxbb8cc70d998b4ac7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:23:14AM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> Anyway, using ssh/scp with the latest from CVS looks much better now. >> It doesn't eat up all CPU anymore and the performance looks pretty >> well as far as I can tell. > >Are these changes captured in the 2009/06/30 snapshot? The 6/30 snapshot incorporates a medium-sized rewrite to select() which allowed me to add a blocking wait in the code for pipes. That doesn't eliminate the possibility that select will chew through CPU time though. I just redid the 7/1 snapshot to pull in Corinna's changes. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple