X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:42:12 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [1.7.0-50] scp progress counter flies through first 175 MB or so Message-ID: <20090629144212.GD19123@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <2ul445d2cfjj1q2t2viropiikoj70slglb@4ax.com> <20090625101039.GP7289@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090625140508.GA17040@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090625143651.GR7289@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090625145005.GB18338@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090628193155.GA10407@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090629092857.GZ30864@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090629095322.GD30864@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090629142348.GB19123@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090629143840.GI30864@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090629143840.GI30864@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:38:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jun 29 10:23, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:53:22AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >On Jun 29 11:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >>On Jun 28 15:31, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>>Btw, Corinna, were you proposing turning the "FIXME" code in peek_pipe >> >>>back on? >> >>[...] >> >>I tested sftp with big files (Gigs) and it appears to work fine with >> >>the FIXME code switched back to life. I tested the unison command >> >>using Cygwin's unison 2.31.4-2 under tcsh and it worked fine. I tested >> >>various combinations with pipes created by a native application and >> >>with native applications on send and receive side of a Cygwin pipe and >> >>all my testcases worked as expected. >> >> >> >>So, maybe we should really give it a try again. >> > >> >Btw., I also tried the rsync of 9000 files with the FIXME code active >> >and it worked a couple of times in a row without fail. >> >> I did make a change subsequent to your turning off this code. Maybe >> that was enough to get things working. Either that or, if you are using >> the trunk code, maybe you aren't hitting this at all anymore since there >> are overlapped I/O accomodations. >> >> Anyway, I wouldn't mind giving the code another try if you are up for >> it. Although I didn't write the code originally, it has always bothered >> me that it didn't work because it seems like it should have. >> >> Shall I turn it on, create a snapshot, and then ask our legion of >> testers to try it? > >Sure, go ahead. I would even go so far as to create a new -51 test >release to get some more testing of this. How about if we do that after seeing what happens with the snapshot (especially since I already sent the email :-|)? If we get good preliminary reports then a new version is certainly called for. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple