X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>
Subject:  Re: Cygwin 1.7 Installation on Server 2008 with Terminal Services
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:07:06 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 14
Message-ID:  <loom.20090623T160403-285@post.gmane.org>
References:  <297343D29C14AA4D822142893ABEAEF3067B857F@srv1163ex1.flightsafety.com> <20090622153241.GZ5039@calimero.vinschen.de> <297343D29C14AA4D822142893ABEAEF3067B8656@srv1163ex1.flightsafety.com> <20090623090152.GF5039@calimero.vinschen.de> <297343D29C14AA4D822142893ABEAEF3067B876F@srv1163ex1.flightsafety.com> <20090623155317.GB4773@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes:

> Bash isn't the only affected binary so it's still worth the FAQ entry.
> But, never mind, I just created one.

The FAQ should mention the 'rebase' package, not the 'rebaseall' package.

And not to sound anxious, but are we going to have a new binutils and gcc 
release prior to cygwin 1.7 going golden?  I've noticed that Dave has made lots 
of patches on the binutils list lately.

-- 
Eric Blake



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple