X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,J_CHICKENPOX_52,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A3238AF.2000206@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:14:55 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 1.7.0 sem_open References: <94b5b62d0906112150g473b49fao41f95c3a1c6e6014@mail.gmail.com> <20090612084932.GC5039@calimero.vinschen.de> <4A322438.9050002@users.sourceforge.net> <20090612101654.GA11934@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090612101958.GB11934@calimero.vinschen.de> <4A323315.9090902@gmail.com> <20090612104407.GA13415@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20090612104407.GA13415@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 12 11:51, Dave Korn wrote: >> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Jun 12 12:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>> On Jun 12 04:47, Yaakov S wrote: >>>>> On 12/06/2009 03:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>>>> Even if linking against librt.a would be necessary on Cygwin >>>>> But a stub librt.a would be helpful nonetheless. It looks like most of >>>>> the relevant symbols are in posix_ipc.cc, timer.cc, and times.cc, but >>>>> there are other symbols defined in the latter two that may not belong in >>>>> librt. >>>> Certainly a good idea. I don't know if it would hurt if too many >>>> symbols could be linked against via librt.a. We could move the >>>> realtime functions from timer.cc and times.cc into its own source >>>> file. Or we could create it with only the symbols from posix_ipc.cc, >>>> just so it is available for linking. >>> For now I did the latter. Adding more symbols to it shouldn't be much >>> of a problem, if required. >> Shouldn't this reuse the speclib mechanism? > > It does. Doh! Sorry, didn't read that into your description of it. cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/