X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4A2D541F.4090509@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:10:39 +0100
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [1.7] Cannot read /proc/stat
References: <4A2D3C62.40408@users.sourceforge.net> <20090608171454.GA25642@calimero.vinschen.de> <igiq25hmtr9jm0j9v05qo8iarj25c0vd54@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <igiq25hmtr9jm0j9v05qo8iarj25c0vd54@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> (*) Is anybody here actually still using NT4?
> 
> Anyone still running NT4 has a security disaster on their hands.  Not that
> that's a reason to cut them off of Cygwin... in fact they probably could
> use the help... but Microsoft EOL'd NT4 years ago, and at some point it
> seems that Cygwin should do the same.

  NT4 is still widely used in corporate environments where it just lives in a
private intranet and isn't exposed (hopefully!) to the outside world.  I think
we shouldn't rush to ditch support for it as long as it doesn't start to
become a significant burden in terms of missing support for newer APIs.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

