X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Andrew Schulman <schulman.andrew@epamail.epa.gov>
Subject:  Re: [1.7] Cannot read /proc/stat
Date:  Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:33:34 -0400
Lines: 6
Message-ID:  <igiq25hmtr9jm0j9v05qo8iarj25c0vd54@4ax.com>
References:  <4A2D3C62.40408@users.sourceforge.net> <20090608171454.GA25642@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-Archive: encrypt
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

> (*) Is anybody here actually still using NT4?

Anyone still running NT4 has a security disaster on their hands.  Not that
that's a reason to cut them off of Cygwin... in fact they probably could
use the help... but Microsoft EOL'd NT4 years ago, and at some point it
seems that Cygwin should do the same.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/