X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4A29561A.1040008@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:30:02 +0100
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] gmp-4.3.1-1 for cygwin-1.7
References: <announce.4A189E22.8050002@gmail.com> 	 <4A287EBF.5020408@users.sourceforge.net> <f89dcc3a0906041922w7f95f86bg86cbef9c5ee14940@mail.gmail.com> <4A2886AD.7000602@users.sourceforge.net> <4A288B1C.7010104@gmail.com> <4A29193A.8000004@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A29193A.8000004@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

David Billinghurst wrote:

> I have rebuilt gmp with CVS binutils and -shared-libgcc.  This fixes the
> problem for me.  Could someone (Yaakov?) download the new DLLs in
> libgmp3-4.3.1-1.tar.bz2 and libgmpxx4-4.3.1-2.tar.bz2 (below) and
> confirm the fix.
> 
> #################  Full gmp package #######################
> 
> D=http://billinghurst.customer.netspace.net.au/cygwin-1.7
> 
> wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=1 \
>  ${D}/gmp/gmp-4.3.1-2-src.tar.bz2 \
>  ${D}/gmp/gmp-4.3.1-2.tar.bz2 \
>  ${D}/gmp/setup.hint \
>  ${D}/gmp/libgmpxx4/libgmpxx4-4.3.1-2.tar.bz2 \
>  ${D}/gmp/libgmpxx4/setup.hint \
>  ${D}/gmp/libgmp3/libgmp3-4.3.1-2.tar.bz2 \
>  ${D}/gmp/libgmp3/setup.hint \
>  ${D}/gmp/libgmp-devel/libgmp-devel-4.3.1-2.tar.bz2 \
>  ${D}/gmp/libgmp-devel/setup.hint

  This doesn't appear to work for me with the existing expr.exe; I think you
should just use new binutils but keep the static libgcc linkage.  The static
ctors in the DLL appear to be getting run twice, which is bad.

    cheers,
      DaveK

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

