X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4A168F2B.4020805@cornell.edu> <2377ADF68DFE455199B53E97E5747E43@HEPNTLTIM3> <4A1B17FD.902@dronecode.org.uk> <4A1BD971.70808@cornell.edu> <83bppfskbt.fsf@gnu.org> <4A1C5831.6030008@cornell.edu> <99716858969849F89D65A4015B9948F7@HEPNTLTIM3> <4A1C9952.8040100@cornell.edu> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 20:56:21 +0100 Message-ID: <416096c60905271256s359d1325g8d2ed3057c3950f3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: emacs -nw keypad From: Andy Koppe To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com > In an xterm (with TERM=xterm) a few keypad keys do in fact have a (not very > useful) definition: kp-f1, kp-f2, kp-f3, kp-f4 are (incorrectly) mapped to f1, > f2, f3, f4 and kp-enter is correctly mapped. With xterm's default config, F1 to F4 do actually send the keypad codes ^[OP to ^[OS. That's because the vt100 terminal had the keys PF1 to PF4 on the keypad, but it didn't have F keys like PC keyboards do. Hence those mappings in emacs do make sense. Andy -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/