X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:43:07 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: newlib@sourceware.org, cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests] Message-ID: <20090515114307.GA25531@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: newlib@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: newlib@sourceware.org, cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20090512165404.GW21324@calimero.vinschen.de> <416096c60905120956n5521929bm69586f5e6325a994@mail.gmail.com> <20090512173153.GY21324@calimero.vinschen.de> <3f0ad08d0905140858j17c7b374paa649f18ef18178d@mail.gmail.com> <20090514172625.GA20688@calimero.vinschen.de> <4A0C925C.6090906@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A0C925C.6090906@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On May 14 17:51, Jeff Johnston wrote: > Corinna, I have no problem with checking the new patch in and extending > this later, assuming you have thoroughly tested this implementation. I tested it with _MB_CAPABLE defined and with _MB_CAPABLE undefined. Both variations worked as expected, the latter using the old newlib implementation using iswprint/iswcntrl. Patch applied. I have adding the CJK variation on my todo list for when I'm back from vacation. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-Leader Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/