X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <23536460.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 01:34:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc Girod To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: emacs 23 In-Reply-To: <4A0B12D0.4020804@cornell.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <23523466.post@talk.nabble.com> <4A0AE529.2000506@cornell.edu> <23524451.post@talk.nabble.com> <4A0AEF5D.7000803@cornell.edu> <23526019.post@talk.nabble.com> <4A0B04F9.7090005@cornell.edu> <23526801.post@talk.nabble.com> <4A0B12D0.4020804@cornell.edu> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Ken Brown-6 wrote: > > On 5/13/2009 2:25 PM, Marc Girod wrote: > The lines in the postinstall scripts involving desktop-database and > mime-database were added by cygport, not by me. > Indeed, no visible problem. One thing I noticed, is that I used cperl-mode 6.2, and 23.0.92 brought back 5.3 (21.2 had 4.23...). Do you think it would be worth upgrading it for everybody? Or would this be a departure from 23 as on other platforms, and therefore unwanted? I just byte-compile 6.2 on 23.0.92, and got a lot of warnings for various obsolete practices... I'll send the transcript to Ilya... Thanks, Marc -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/insert-directory-function-in-Gnu-emacs-returns-nil-tp23523466p23536460.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/