Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:04:22 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are 	non-empty
Message-ID: <20090504050422.GA4733@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <49FE746E.2080409@bonhard.uklinux.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49FE746E.2080409@bonhard.uklinux.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 05:51:58AM +0100, Fergus wrote:
> >>Just noticed that after the recent unison upgrade there exists a file
> >> 	/usr/bin/unison
> >>Also just noticed (but this must have occurred a while ago - 30/03/09
> >>maybe, the date of a TeX upgrade?) that there now exists a directory
> >> 	/usr/lib/texmf/
> >>with deep non-empty subdirectory structure.  Is it the case for [1.7]
> >>that both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ should be empty as for [1.5]?
> >>
> >>Possibly the texmf/ packaging issue has been corrected in subsequent
> >>upgrades and so /usr/lib/texmf/ can be deleted without compromising
> >>functionality; but I think the appearance of /usr/bin/unison is very
> >>new.
>
> >How about humoring our need for details by providing cygcheck output
> >as mentioned at http://cygwin.com/problems.html ?
>
> Sorry. Attached.

For the future: there's no need to bzip the attachment.  That makes it harder
to read.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/